To Read This Week: Around the Apologetics World Wide Web

1. Rapid Response: “You Can’t Be Certain About the Claims of Christianity”

J. Warner Wallace, author of Cold-Case Christianity and God’s Crime Scene, continues his Rapid Response series, in which “we tackle common concerns about (and objections to) the Christian worldview by providing short, conversational responses. These posts are designed to model what our answers might look like in a one-on-one setting, while talking to a friend or family member.”  This post deals with the following statement:

“No one can be absolutely certain about ancient historical claims, and the Bible can’t be proven beyond a possible doubt. The claims of Christianity are dramatic and critical. If you want me to believe these kinds of claims you’d have to be able to prove them beyond any doubt.”

How would you respond to such a statement? Here is a conversational example of how I recently replied:

“I can empathize with this sort of concern. In fact, I often hear similar statements from prospective jurors in criminal trials. During the jury selection process, we sometimes ask jurors if they will be able to make a decision, even though they may have unanswered questions or possible doubts. If they say they wouldn’t be able to render a verdict unless every question is answered and every doubt resolved, we simply excuse them from service. Why? Because the standard of proof (the SOP) in our homicide trials isn’t ‘beyond a possible doubt,’ it’s ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ and there’s a big difference between these two standards.

You can read the rest here.

2. Five Myths About the Ancient Heresy of Gnosticism

Michael J. Kruger, President and Samuel C. Patterson Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at Reformed Theological Seminary, discusses Gnosticism:

Gnosticism  was a heretical version of Christianity that burst on the scene primarily in the second century and gave the orthodox Christians a run for their money.  And it seems that some scholars look back and wish that the Gnostics had prevailed.  After all, it is argued, traditional Christianity was narrow, dogmatic, intolerant, elitist, and mean-spirited, whereas Gnosticism was open-minded, all-welcoming, tolerant and loving.  Given this choice, which would you choose?

Dr. Kruger goes on to expose the myths that surround Gnosticism today.

3. How Should We Respond to The “King James Only” Claim?

Greg Koukl from Stand to Reason handles the question: How should we respond to the claim that the King James translation of the Bible is the only valid translation?

A five minute video clip provides the answer: